Nucleonics Matrix
- Hydrogen
- Helium
- Oxygen
- Neon
- Nitrogen
- Carbon
- Silicon
- Magnesium
- Iron
- Sulfur
- Argon
- Aluminum
|
This is a list of what we think are the Twelve most abundant elements
in the universe.
|
The Incremental Table of Atomic Isobars
| n = p-1 |
n = p |
001 99.985%
SUPER
Stable
1.0078250
|
|
| |
002 0.015%
Stable
2.0141017
|
003 0.000137%
Stable
3.0160293
|
|
| |
004 99.999863%
SUPER
Stable
4.0026032
|
|
7 July 2005
My name is Alain Lareau. Please enjoy the postings that these pages direct to.
The site is for the most part a record of my attempt to get an idea across to some,
at least the ones that stand still.
I place the small table here once more and give a
short description.
The Incremental Table of Atomic Isobars
stable to forth row
| n = p-1 |
n = p |
001 99.985%
SUPER
Stable
1.0078250
|
|
| |
002 0.015%
Stable
2.0141017
|
003 0.000137%
Stable
3.0160293
|
|
| |
004 99.999863%
SUPER
Stable
4.0026032
|
One of the first concepts I've wanted people examine is
Stability by Degree, that beyond being stable a nuclide
may exhibit distinct qualities of durability in a range of durability.
I introduce the yellow color code to delineate this, the tan color
denotes a stable nuclide and the orange the most common isotope of an
element if not marked off with yellow as "SUPER Stable".
The pink color denotes a radioisotope with half-life measured in years,
the purple denotes those isobars of half-life measured in days. Next is
a light blue for nuclides of even faster decay and this shades to white
for those that hardly exist for microseconds.
As many will know, Hydrogen and Helium are the most abundant elements
in the cosmos, each have two stable flavors. The above chart depicts
this. Nature favors one isotope over the other. This kind of data has
been displayed as the "Segre Chart", it is very useful for chemists.
In my chart "The Incremental Table of Atomic Isobars" the display lends
to metaphor that nature favors the Isobars numbers one
and four as geometric form. From this point of view I have asked people
to examine why nature does not favor the existence of an isobar-5.
I post this next table to illustrate
Below are some of the statements I've posted in groups but with little luck
I tend to view all the neutrons and protons of an atomic nucleus, while they exist in and as the nucleus the same. That is I do not view them as charge specific nor quark composite specific. I view them as fluid to some degree. The quality that I do impart to them is they still must fill space, and so I tend to the use of the term "isobar" instead of isotope.
The Platonic and Archimedean solids are omnipresent in nature indeed but why? They represent equal division of a sphere, which is the whole point!
If you try to put five marbles together one will always be odd-man-out.
Why does nature favor the sphere? Think of the soap bubble, OK atomic
nuclei are more complex, but can not a soap bubble oscillate somewhat,
why do we suppose atomic nuclei cannot?
Well that said please examine with the term isobars in mind the lack of
stable nuclides
in the isobar-5 and isobar-8 zones.
| H 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
H 2 |
|
|
|
|
| He 3 |
|
H 3 |
|
|
|
| |
He 4 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C 12 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
N 14 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
O 16 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ne 20 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mg 24 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Al 27 |
|
|
|
| |
Si 28 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
S 32 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Ar 40 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Fe 56 |